Trying to determine if outsourcing is right for your company? Wishing you could find a contractor willing to give you advice on your options rather than just selling you “one size fits all” services? We’ve created this blog to help companies wanting to answer those questions. Our posts will include helpful tips on choosing the right outsourcing partner, information on upcoming conferences and events we participate in, success stories, and short articles on processes or technology that can save time or enhance quality. We welcome your feedback and comments.
When the team at Spectrum Assembly, Inc. tells a customer they are an extension of their manufacturing team, they mean it. One of the key ways this talk is walked, occurs in New Product Introduction (NPI) via SAI’s TransferAssist Service. Designed for customers new to outsourcing the service puts a Tiger Team in place to assess customer processes and address gaps in documentation and materials prior to the project transfer or product introduction.
The following case study illustrates the value of this service:
A company wishing to launch the next generation of a sports medicine product came to SAI. Their original product line had been mechanically simple and they wanted to increase functionality. This increased the product’s footprint significantly and required a much more complex mechanical assembly process. The customer wanted SAI to develop the manufacturing process instructions in addition to building the product.
Manufacturing process instructions are developed as part of the NPI process. The customer’s documentation for wire and cable assemblies, electronic assemblies, mechanical assemblies and cosmetics is transmitted to the Aegis system and used to create visual work instructions that combine the documentation assembly aids with notes made by SAI’s engineering team.
This project had several challenges. This was a box build job that included cables, printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs), mechanical components, chassis, sheet metal, plastics and hardware plus fluidics, and air and water lines. Routing the tubing in a limited chassis space was a challenge. SAI’s team applied the experience it had in cable and harness assembly to address the tubing routing challenge, using same process model it used in developing efficient wire and harness routing to route the fluidic, air and water lines. Trial builds were done and the team developed a tubing cut list to ensure that all tubing was cut to appropriate lengths for the preferred routing. The customer watch the trial build process to ensure it met their requirements.
While computer modeling can be an efficient way for a design team to develop assembly drawings occasionally what looks great on the computer screen turns out to be an inefficient order of operations on the production line. Having a combination of computer modelling and hands-on trial builds ensures that nothing gets missed and that the order of operations is fully optimized.
SAI’s team also supported materials sourcing. When the customer’s engineering team originally created the bill of materials (BOM), they were simply looking for prototype quantities of the parts to support their proof of concept activities. Many of the custom parts were sourced through prototype shops. SAI’s team took the BOM and then identified suppliers with the best lead-time, best cost and a stable supply chain. In some cases, they recommended keeping suppliers that were tooled and competitive, however, they also identified alternate sources for suppliers that weren’t a good initial choice.
Finally, SAI’s team looked at the logistics side of the project. The product is used by sports teams and the crating needed to be both cost competitive, yet designed to support likely transport by end customers to other locations. Printing requirements, form, fit and function of all packaging was evaluated.
SAI typically provides some level of assistance to every customer. In this case, the team provided assistance over the customer’s entire product commercialization strategy, and truly lived up to our commitment to be an extension of their team.
As a company that specializes in being a one-stop shop of PCBAs, cable & harnesses and final assembly, Spectrum Assembly’s team works hard to ensure that projects are optimized for efficient assembly. Cables and harnesses are one area where SAI’s expertise comes in handy, since this part of the design is often not scrutinized as closely as PCBAs or the final assembly by customer design teams. Here are seven common mistakes the team at SAI sees:
- Wrong terminal or contact for specified wire gauge. If the contact is too large, the crimp will be loose and fall off. Conversely, if it is too small the crimp will be too tight and may damage the wire strand immediately or destroy it over time. In some cases, the terminal specification is correct, but an incorrect wire gauge or tolerance is specified.
- Male connector housing with female terminal. While this mistake is easily fixable, it can generate significant non value-added activity if not caught in documentation.
- Incompatible materials on header and cable. For example, specifying a gold-plated header on the PCB connector, but using tin on the cable terminal, can create resistance issues immediately and corrosion longer term.
- Cable documentation shows pinout but doesn’t identify connector. If the pinout only shows a single view and the connector isn’t identified, in the best case it slows down the new product introduction process and in the worst case it can result in an incorrect connector being used. If the pinout is incorrect it results in unnecessary rework.
- Incomplete or missing wire list. This is a frequent mistake with two-wire connections. It can cause quality issues.
- Proper crimp tool not specified. The tools used to crimp wire are specifically sized for the cable. Failure to specify the correct tool size or specification of an incorrect tool can create quality issues. IPC-A-620 includes a requirement for specification of crimp height and tool test.
- Insufficient electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding or placement too close to sources of EMI. Insufficient EMI shielding or placement of sensitive cables near a power supply can create intermittent product failures.
SAI’s team is expert enough to be able to identify these issues as they occur. However, the best option is to avoid the issue in the first place by working with the intended contract manufacturer as early in the design process as possible. The focus that SAI’s team puts on ensuring cables and harnesses meet the requirements of IPC-A-620 is equal to the level of detail it focuses on in ensuring PCBAs are compliant with IPC-A-610 requirements.
Spectrum Assembly, Inc.’s Q3 2017 newsletter discusses best practices in getting ready to outsource, SAI’s selection as a finalist in the San Jose Business Journal’s Manufacturing Awards for the third year in a row and how its responsive support is helping one cable and harness customer. Read the full issue here.
Spectrum Assembly, Inc.’s quarterly newsletter is out. This quarter’s issue discusses our new equipment investments, solutions we are providing a new medical customer, our latest facility expansion and our successful completion of our ISO surveillance audits. Read more here.
Spectrum Assembly, Inc. will be exhibiting in Booths 302 and 304 at the Del Mar Electronics and Design Show. Access your free registration here.
Jimmy Durante Blvd, Del Mar, CA
SAI’s Q1 2017 newsletter is out. This quarter’s issue discusses our Circuits Assembly Service Excellence Awards, our flex and rigid-flex circuit assembly capabilities, and the flexibility we provide KIC Thermal. Download here.
SAI’s Operations Manager Adrian Nishimoto was recently interviewed about the Company’s flex circuit capability and the key elements he felt were important in assembling superior quality flex and rigid-flex assemblies. Read the full article here.